Breaking Political News, Polling Reports, Election Results, Commentary and Analysis
Thursday May 23rd 2013

Yes, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Is a Racial Entitlement. Just ask the DOJ

Truth and revolution can appear suddenly, and darken the brightest of times.

Consider yesterday’s Department of Justice inspector general’s report documenting the rancid racialist attitudes of the Voting Section staff.

Media Credit: Washington Post

Media Credit: Washington Post

(See: “Inspector General Report of Racialist Dysfunction Inside DOJ.”) The Justice Department should hope that Justice Antonin Scalia — or his clerks — don’t catch wind of the IG report before Shelby v. Holder is decided. If he or they do, they will find a particularly interesting discussion regarding what Justice Scalia called “racial entitlements” in Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

The left has been apoplectic about Scalia’s observation. But yesterday’s DOJ inspector general’s report makes plain: many staff inside the Justice Department define Section 5 exactly as Scalia does: as a “racial entitlement.”

In the report, Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez — a possible Obama nominee to head the Department of Labor — makes clear that he doesn’t think Section 5 should ever be used to protect a white minority in covered jurisdictions.

Perez feels it should only be used to prop up the political position of “people of color.” If the victims of discrimination happen to be white, too bad — they are not protected.

Source Rule of Law » PJ Media

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.