Americans often buy guns for self-defense, a purpose that now has Supreme Court validation. But according to advocates of gun control, those purchasers overlook the people who pose the greatest threat: themselves. Anyone who acquires a firearm, we are told, is inviting a bloody death by suicide.
So says Matthew Miller, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health. “If you bought a gun today, I could tell you the risk of suicide to you and your family members is going to be two- to tenfold higher over the next 20 years,” he told The Washington Post. Since the chance of a gun being used for suicide is so much higher than the chance of it being used to prevent a murder, we would all be better off with fewer firearms around.
It’s a rich irony — as though smoke alarms were increasing fire fatalities. But the argument raises two questions: Is it true? And, when it comes to gun control policy, does it matter?
As it turns out, the claims about guns and suicide don’t stand up well to scrutiny. A report by the National Academy of Sciences was doubtful, noting that the alleged association is small and may be illusory.
Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck says there are at least 13 published studies finding no meaningful connection between the rate of firearms ownership and the rate of suicides. The consensus of experts, he says, is that an increase in gun ownership doesn’t raise the number of people who kill themselves — only the number who do it with a gun.
That makes obvious sense. Someone who really wants to commit suicide doesn’t need a .38, because alternative methods abound.
Gun opponents, however, respond that guns inevitably raise the rate because they’re uniquely lethal. Take away the gun, and you greatly increase the chance of survival.
But in his book, “Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control,” Kleck points out that “suicide attempts with guns are only slightly more likely to end in death than those involving hanging, carbon-monoxide poisoning, or drowning.” It’s not hard to think of some other pretty foolproof means of self-destruction — such as jumping off a tall (or even not so tall) building, stepping in front of a train or driving at 80 m.p.h. into a telephone pole.