Senate Forces Military to use $27 per Gallon Biofuel

Senate Forces Military to use $27 per Gallon Biofuel

Eleven Republicans vote with most Democrats to impose “green energy” mandate

Move over $800 toilet seats. Instead of letting our fighting men and women fill up on fuel at the prices that you pay at the pump, the U.S. Senate has just voted to force the military to pay $27 per gallon on ultra-pricey biofuels that nobody else wants. Read all about it from the Institute for Energy Research.

The real crime in this is that eleven Republicans joined most Democrats in the 62-37 vote. My son just enlisted in the Army today. I’d suggest that he and his fellow soldiers are a better place to invest than paying 10x more than necessary for fuel.

Read More 

Institute for Energy Research | Green Biofuels Vote Proves Senate Not Serious about Budget or Security

You see, if the secretary was paying attention—or cared—he would have done due diligence in his homework and found that contrary to the politically correct notion that somehow we are running low on fuel in the United States and indeed the world, we are in fact living in an age when we are finding and producing more oil than ever and world proven reserves of oil are at their highest level ever. How the secretary believes the national security of the United States is enhanced by spending 10 times as much as necessary for fuel within an increasingly limited defense budget is beyond comprehension.

Even more stunning is the fact that senators who should know better fell for the secretary’s claptrap. For example, a spokesman for Senator Lisa Murkowski told the National Journal that “Secretary Mabus talked to her on this issue and explained it as an important national-security issue for the military. “Senator Murkowski understood that.”  Senator Murkowski is the incoming ranking Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and represents the state of Alaska, which recently was surpassed in oil production by North Dakota where the federal government only owns 3% of the lands.

Interestingly, if the military uses 130 million barrels of oil per year, that means that Alaska’s ANWR, which is estimated to hold 10.4 billion barrels of oil at the mean would supply all of the military’s needs for 80 years. Yet Secretary Mabus’s administration opposes the opening of ANWR’s oil, apparently preferring the green biofuels costing 10 times as much. ANWR’s 10.4 billion barrels of oil are worth almost $1 trillion to the US economy at today’s price of oil, and the jobs, revenue and security of supply they would offer our nation draw a bright contrast to the expensive and unnecessary green energy the Senate decided to waste taxpayers money on this past week.  In fact, Secretary Mabus’s administration actually closed 50% of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska earlier this year for oil exploration.  This area was set aside in 1920 as an oil reserve for the Navy, and until 1976, was actually called the “Naval Petroleum Reserve Alaska.”  Would anyone be interested in a bet as to whether Secretary Mabus is even aware of that?

This is but one example of why many people have had it with Washington DC and its seeming inability to act like adults during a time of national crisis and growing international instability. On the one hand we can squander limited funds belonging to the military on fuels that are both unnecessary and outrageously expensive. On the other, we could simply allow Americans to go to work to produce secure American supplies of energy which would actually help generate revenue for our military and all other uses. Our ” leaders” in Washington did that thing they always seem to do— the wrong thing that we will pay for long into the future.

via Institute for Energy Research

About the Author

Politisite delivers the latest Breaking Political News, Debate Coverage, Election Results, Commentary and Analysis. We provide in-depth news with special reports and interactive political coverage. Politisite was a pioneer in internet political news gathering and dissemination. Politisite came live in early 1998 and become the first internet only news source to cover local, state, and national political campaigns, debates and elections. Before there were the terms Blog, Blogger, New Media, or Crowd-sourcing, Politisite was developing what has become the standard in political news coverage, long before most political sites were even conceived. The Name ‘Politisite” simply means Political Website.

Author Archive Page