Sandra Fluke is no Slut, but she is prostituting for the Democratic National Committee

Sandra Fluke is no Slut, but she is prostituting for the Democratic National Committee

For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

via Breaking: Sandra Fluke Exposed As Fraud, Activist, Possible White House Operative – With Video at Pat Dollard.

Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

July 30 2011

Does your campus’s LSRJ chapter face opposition in regard to facilitating a comprehensive conversation about reproductive justice? Well mine definitely does! While my campus has a mix of people with different backgrounds, and a rich liberal arts community, the Midwest doesn’t exactly scream bleeding liberal. Some LSRJ chapters at conservative campuses face opposition in the form of other, more conservative, student run organizations; some face it from their administrations, and others from their peers, or the community in general. Whatever the opposition is, it can be incredibly frustrating and disheartening.

The question is, how do we combat this conservative opposition and oppression, in order to facilitate a discussion and educate others about the RJ movement? I am obviously not alone in facing these problems, as Sandra Fluke of Georgetown lead a packed room in a discussion on this question at the first Issue Caucus that I attended at the Leadership Institute, LSRJ’s national conference at Berkeley.

While no solution was definitively reached, and I personally don’t begin to have the “right” answer, I was really charged by the discussion and feel many great ideas were presented. Some campus chapters decided to take an adversarial approach, feeling it important to use those “scary” words the opposition fears.

Further background research on Ms Fluke reveals that she got her start in government in New York in 2009.

Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.

As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.

Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.

via Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke | Jammie Wearing Fools.

Sandra Fluke, Gender Reassignment, and Health Insuranc

Sandra Fluke is being sold by the left as something she’s not. Namely a random co-ed from Georgetown law who found herself mixed up in the latest front of the culture war who was simply looking to make sure needy women had access to birth control. That, of course, is not the case.

As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 year old long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students’ birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.

However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.

The title of the article, which can be purchased in full here, is Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons and was published in the Journal’s 2011 Annual Review. I have posted a transcript of the section I will be quoting from here. In a subsection of the article entitled “Employment Discrimination in Provision of Employment Benefits” starting on page 635 of the review Sandra Fluke and her co-editor describe two forms of discrimination in benefits they believe LGBTQ individuals face in the work place:

via Sandra Fluke, Gender Reassignment, and Health Insurance | MRCTV.

Obama Calls Sandra Fluke, to tell her Job well done

Yeah, I know.  Snerdley, I told you, “This is gonna be bigger than the phony soldiers,” and he didn’t think it was.  I said, “Oh, it’s gonna be ten times bigger.  This is gonna be ten times bigger than the phony soldiers, ten times bigger than the Michael J. Fox thing, ’cause the Democrats are desperate.”  The Democrats are desperate, and I don’t know why they want people… Well, I do know why they want people to fear me.  This is all they’ve got, is to go out and try to discredit their critics, to impugn and discredit the people who disagree with them. Because there’s no way, if we actually sat down and had a debate about this proposition, anybody on the left can win this.  Not in a sane world where there is common sense.

Apparently Sandra Fluke told Obama something. When he asked her if she’s okay, she said that Obama told her that she should tell her parents they should be proud. (pause) Okay, I’m button my lip on that one.  The president tells Sandra Fluke (chuckling), 30-year-old Sandra Fluke, that her parents should be proud.  Okay.  Let me ask you a question.  I might be surprised at the answer I would get to this question.  Your daughter appears before a congressional committee and says she’s having so much sex, she can’t pay for it and wants a new welfare program to pay for it. Would you be proud?  I don’t know about you, but I’d be embarrassed.  I’d disconnect the phone. I’d go into hiding and hope the media didn’t find me.  See, everybody forgets what starts this, or what started this whole thing. Or maybe they don’t! Maybe that’s normal behavior on the left now, for all I know.

But it’s one thing for Obama to call and ask her if she’s okay.

I’m waiting for Bill Clinton to call her.


RUSH:  Have I denied Sandra Fluke her birth control pills?

“No, but you would.”

No I wouldn’t.  I wouldn’t deny her her birth control pills.  That’s not what this is about. This isn’t about birth control pills, anyway, folks.  This isn’t about contraception anyway.  This is about expanding the reach and power of government into your womb, if you’re a woman.  This is about the Democrat Party wanting more and more control over you.  What was early feminism all about?  Emancipation, individuality, freedom, liberation, all of these things. Now here comes Danica Patrick out and she says, “I’m perfectly comfortable letting the government make my health decisions for me.”  Well, folks, I’m gonna tell you: Right there, that’s the death and the end of feminism.

via The Democrats are Desperate: Obama Calls Sandra Fluke, the 30-Year-Old Victim – The Rush Limbaugh Show.


Contraception-Deception:Sandra Fluke,Obama torture the truth | Caldwell’s Corner

The media storm raging over Limbaugh’s “slut” comment, is drowning out the truth in favor of the salacious “Fluke is a victim of the big bad bully” narrative. (Yes, the adage still holds true, sex DOES sell.) Unfortunately, Limbaugh’s comment played right into the left’s hands.

Anyone now questioning Fluke and her motives and the truth of her story can now be characterized as just “piling on” and being one of those “evil conservatives” who want to take women’s “rights” back to the middle ages. While that narrative could not be further from the truth, it is the narrative that will be used, and sadly it is the narrative that the minion-media lemmings will absorb with ease.

Perhaps the best and most concise headline I’ve seen to date comes from

“Sandra Fluke is no Slut, but she is prostituting for the Democratic National Committee”

(And no, the Corner will not apologize.)

The truth is this entire deceptive campaign has been about nothing more than creating a “crisis” to deflect attention away from historically high gas prices, real inflation upwards of eight percent, trillions upon trillions of dollars stolen from our children and grandchildren “re-distributed” to Democrat pet projects and political cronies, and the only answer from Dear Leader is: “Give me four more years.”

via Contraception-Deception:Sandra Fluke,Obama torture the truth | Caldwell’s Corner.

About the Author

Politisite delivers the latest Breaking Political News, Debate Coverage, Election Results, Commentary and Analysis. We provide in-depth news with special reports and interactive political coverage. Politisite was a pioneer in internet political news gathering and dissemination. Politisite came live in early 1998 and become the first internet only news source to cover local, state, and national political campaigns, debates and elections. Before there were the terms Blog, Blogger, New Media, or Crowd-sourcing, Politisite was developing what has become the standard in political news coverage, long before most political sites were even conceived. The Name ‘Politisite” simply means Political Website.

Author Archive Page


  1. I doubt her name is even real. Sandra FLUKE. All scripted. Rush played his part to catapult this fictional character into the national spotlight. He’s a fraud too.

  2. Guess who is on the advisory board of the “Law Students for Reproductive Justice” (org. that Fluke started at Georgetown)?- None other than Rep. Louise Slaughter….hmmmmmm.

  3. Ms. Fluke obviously isn’t a math major.
    Walmart sells birth control pills for $25 for a three month supply, or $100/year.
    One tenth of the $1000 fantasy figure she lied about.
    Also, far cheaper than cigarettes…

    1. You need to check your facts. I am fairly certain that Walmart’s pharmacy collects a $25 Co-pay from people whose insurance covers birth control.

  4. “No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.”
    ― Samuel Adams

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.